Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct
Commission on Judicial Conduct
The Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct is a Constitutionally Mandated judicial disciplinary agency in Arizona. It was established in 1970 after state voters approved an amendment to the Arizona Constitution.
The commission has oversight over all state judges regarding judicial conduct.
The Problem:
A commission on judicial conduct is created to be composed of eleven persons consisting of;
Two Judges of the court of appeals, two Judges of the superior court, one Justice of the peace and one municipal court Judge, who shall be appointed by the supreme court, two members of the state bar of Arizona, who shall be appointed by the governing body of such bar association (Arizona Supreme Court), and three citizens who are not Judges, retired judges nor members of the state bar of Arizona, who shall be appointed by the governor subject to confirmation by the senate in the manner prescribed by law.
No Resolve to the problem?
The problem is the public participation factor is a low 3 to 8 ratio, 3 being the public, and 8 in favor to the governing judiciary (legal community). This means, the public vote can be out voted by 2.67 to 1.
If all three public members voted to sanction a judge, the public vote (citizen's vote) could not carry the majority unless three of the votes came from the legal field from the members from the legal community.
This rarely has ever happened in Arizona.
Simply, this means if all "three Citizens" rule that a Judge's Conduct is reprimandable, the "citizens" ruling (vote) can be overridden 1. use one's authority to reject or cancel (a decision, view, etc.).
2. interrupt the action of (an automatic device), typically in order to take manual control., by the other Eight Judges and Lawyers whom are part of "the system",
(self-policing system1. the process of keeping order or maintaining control within a community without accountability or reference to an external authority.
2. (of a community) independently responsible for keeping and maintaining order.).
This is a typical structuring in a self policing system. This is to give the public the apperance of being fair and impartial and the sense of public participation.
Keep in mind that your opinion is out numbered by a 2.67 to 1 ratio. This is not even close to fair or impartial. This is stacking1. to make arrangements so it's very difficult for somebody to achieve something.
2. to face difficult and unfair circumstances when trying to achieve something. the outcome.
This in essence, is a useless task to file a judicial complaint with the office of The Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Typically your complaint will be dismissed with the phrase attached "not clear and convincing", although you have clearly proved the person you have made a complaint on has clearly committed a wrongful act or even broken the "known and established Laws", as what happened in our circumstance when a judicial complaint was filed against Now Ex-Judge Sally Schneider Duncan.
Some of you may have had interactions with Ex-Judge Sally Duncan.
Not Isolated
At all phases of reporting a wrongful act or even a criminal act being perpetrated against you by the very people you are to report the misconduct to, resistance and obstruction is offered instead of compliance.
Before I get ahead of myself, let me explain in detail and with supporting evidence, That Arizona has become more than 90% Fascist. a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the "perceived good" of the state, and strong regimentation of society and the economy. Although, the ideaologya system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy. has been contorted in the state of Arizona, but the remaining effect[s] is still the same.
Lets explore the events and why this is no isolated incident that began starting on May 11th., 2016 and the preceeding events to the current date.
These events are all intertwined with the Arizona Judicial System from an Arizona justice court (country meadows) to to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to the United States Supreme Court!
